MakeVictoriaBetter

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Government St. 'Closure' Proposed

Lower Government Street is a prime destination for tourists and locals alike in downtown Victoria

Recently, this letter to the editor of the Times Colonist caught my attention.

"I know -- close Government to through traffic for the summer, so residents and visitors can truly enjoy a traffic-free experience. Local businesses will flourish as drivers cannot shop anyway -- there's no parking on Government Street."

I have been thinking about this same idea for a long time. Such closures have proven to be economically, environmentally, socially, and culturally beneficial for cities all over the world.

A local group has been pushing for this idea, already. John Vickers and the Citizens for the Government Street Pedestrian Mall are organizing a 10-day international busking event for the summer of 2011. Their intention is to use the event to convince local business owners to give the pedestrianization of lower Government a chance.

To me, such a 'closure' would actually be an OPENING and could only be a good thing. In the words of (I think) street reclaimer David Engwicht, "No one goes to Paris for the traffic."

The idea of closing part of Gov't St. has been discussed since the 70s (so I read). No amount of discussion or study will tell us whether or not it's a good idea. The City should try it this summer and let it grow with success.

I recently read an article (can't find the link, sorry) about the difference in the speed-of-change in New York vs. LA when it comes to such 'innovations'. In LA, they conduct analyses, drawn-out case studies, and assessments that take weeks, months, years, or decades and nothing ever happens. In New York, a good idea is pushed through the red tape, given a try, and, if it works, they stick with it. For example, the closure of parts of Broadway in Manhattan went from proposal, to trial, to permanent in one short year!

It's about time Victoria tried this.

8 comments:

Unknown said...

I like the idea but found that David Engwicht quote a little disingenuous.

No one goes to Paris for the traffic.....but cars still drive down Champs D'elysee.

Evan said...

First comment on the site! Cheers, Piers.

In what way is that quote disingenuous?

The Champs-Elysees is major city arterial which, as far as I know, would not otherwise be of particular interest to visitors or locals alike if it were not for a world-famous monument and historical significance.

Visitors go, stay, and love Paris for the cafe culture, the visual and cultural interest, and all of the people-oriented alleys, streets, and neighbourhoods that make Paris Paris.

(That being said, Paris has a major traffic problem as far as I know.)

Evan said...

This

vs.

This

Unknown said...

... anyone notice the number of trucks parked along government street most summer mornings? those trucks are delivering supplies for the local business. Pretty sure there is a little more to the story...

Evan said...

Welcome, Peter.

I am glad you brought this up.

Delivery, service, and emergency vehicular access seems to be the first/main concern for such an initiative.

Fortunately, there are a lot of commonsensical solutions. And, there are plenty of successful examples, worldwide -- most of which contain local businesses that require delivery and service access -- that can be used as potential models.

It is a matter of picking (initially and then through trial-and-error) the best solution for your given location.

For example...

- only allow deliveries during specified hours (e.g., 12am-10am, 12am-12pm)

- allow service/delivery vehicles permanent access (but they must yield to pedestrians)

- delivery and service vehicles access business through backstreets and alleys

- deliveries and services cover the remaining distance on foot (or bike)

Evan said...

And...

I've seen some case studies which show that deliveries actually become more efficient due to less competing traffic, more spatial freedom (stop at doorstep, hop out, hop in), etc...

Unknown said...

I actually agree with Government being closed to all non-commercial traffic. It's already almost effectively impossible to drive down there now with the amount of stop-signs/pedestrian traffic/trucks parked there.

Evan said...

Thanks for the string of comments, Terry. Welcome to the makevictoriabetter.

Post a Comment

Two things:

1) A lot of discussion about this site happens on facebook; so, I would recommend finding the site (link on the right sidebar) and me there.

2) I'm experimenting with non-sign-in commenting to encourage more discussion (the 2 minutes it takes to create a google/other account seems like too much trouble).

Being 'anonymous' is pretty lame, so at least make up a fake name to use.